Re: ACTION-68: Proposed text for "contextmenu issue"

> Regarding: https://www.w3.org/2012/pointerevents/track/actions/68
> 
> How about:
> "Note that the relative order of these high-level events (click,
> contextmenu, focus, blur, etc.) with pointer events is undefined and varies
> between user agents."
> 
> Perhaps we want to define some term for "high-level" (or "semantic input
> events") earlier in the the paragraph as part of Jacob's work to expand it
> (and encourage the use of these sorts of events when appropriate).
> 
> We could go on with a more concrete example like the following, but I think
> it's probably overkill:
> "For example, on some user agents contextmenu will often follow a
> pointerup, on others it'll often proceed a pointerup or pointercancel, and
> in some situations it may be fired without any corresponding pointer event".

Per the 2/11 meeting, I have made this change. 

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerevents/rev/c979a3e19faa

-Jacob

Received on Friday, 18 April 2014 23:31:49 UTC