On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Matt Brubeck <mbrubeck@mozilla.com> wrote: > I haven't seen any justification for the pointerID == 1 requirement for > mouse input. I agree with Konstantinov that it seems to serve no purpose, > and I agree with Sangwhan that it provides a redundant and less-clear way > to handle an already-covered use case. I'm also worried it encourages a > misconception that other pointerIDs might have meaning other than as opaque > identifiers. > > Are there any objections to removing this sentence from section 3.1? > > "If the device producing the event is a mouse, then the pointerId *must*be 1. Device types other than mouse > *must not* have a pointerId of 1." > > I have no objection. I believe there were others who didn't object the last time this was discussed, but I don't think there's a record of who was included in that group.
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2013 17:11:43 UTC