[Bug 26094] New: Tiny editorial tweak to 11.2 note on events fired for activation
[Bug 26013] New: Note in "10 Pointer Capture" to mention implicit pointer capture
[Bug 24923] What should happen to the mouse events if pointer event listener removes the target from document or hides it?
[Bug 24923] What should happen to the mouse events if pointer event listener removes the target from document or hides it?
[Bug 24923] What should happen to the mouse events if pointer event listener removes the target from document or hides it?
[Bug 24923] What should happen to the mouse events if pointer event listener removes the target from document or hides it?
[Bug 25147] What should happen when element.setPointerCapture is called while the pointer is already being captured?
[Bug 24971] Should got/lostpointercapture be dispatched asynchronously or synchronously
[Bug 25216] Tiny editorial tweak: adding <code> tags to note in PointerEvent interface > pointerId
[Bug 25215] Tweak to example 1 and what element touch-action is applied to
[Bug 25214] Note for pointerType mentions non-existent "appendix" + reinforce best practice of accepting unknown pointer types
[Bug 21749] Setting a capture on an offshore element
[Bug 25214] Note for pointerType mentions non-existent "appendix" + reinforce best practice of accepting unknown pointer types
[Bug 25072] Tiny clarification for "10 Pointer Capture"
[Bug 25758] New: Change PointerEvent width and height to double (Was: Sub-pixel coordinate granularity)
- [Bug 25758] Change PointerEvent width and height to double (Was: Sub-pixel coordinate granularity)
- [Bug 25758] Change PointerEvent width and height to double (Was: Sub-pixel coordinate granularity)
[Bug 21749] Setting a capture on an offshore element
[Bug 21749] Setting a capture on an offshore element
[Bug 25147] What should happen when element.setPointerCapture is called while the pointer is already being captured?
[Bug 24971] Should got/lostpointercapture be dispatched asynchronously or synchronously
[Bug 25214] Note for pointerType mentions non-existent "appendix" + reinforce best practice of accepting unknown pointer types
[Bug 25220] New: Use elided pseudo-code instead of alert() in examples 1 and 2
- [Bug 25220] Use elided pseudo-code instead of alert() in examples 1 and 2
- [Bug 25220] Use elided pseudo-code instead of alert() in examples 1 and 2