- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 04:42:32 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25147 --- Comment #1 from Jacob Rossi [MSFT] <jrossi@microsoft.com> --- The proposal in Comment 5 of Bug 24971 would address this: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24971#c5 setPointerCapture/releasePointerCapture set and clear the "pending" capture node. Capture is changed to the "pending" capture node ( and gotpointercapture/lostpointercapture fired) when a UA is to fire the next pointer event for the pointer. Thus, multiple calls before the next event are essentially coalesced to one change of capture. Furthermore, calling elm.setPointerCapture(id) when elm already is the capture node for the pointer does not generate a change of capture (or the got/lost events). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2014 04:42:33 UTC