- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 00:39:06 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26013
Bug ID: 26013
Summary: Note in "10 Pointer Capture" to mention implicit
pointer capture
Product: PointerEventsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Pointer Events specification
Assignee: jrossi@microsoft.com
Reporter: redux@splintered.co.uk
QA Contact: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: public-pointer-events@w3.org
As discussed on list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014AprJun/0087.html
I'd propose adding a note to "10. Pointer Capture" in the introductory section,
after Fig 4: (slightly altered from my original suggestion)
"NOTE: browsers MAY implement their own implicit pointer capture behaviour -
for instance, for touch interactions, a browser may automatically capture the
pointer as part of a tap on a native form control (such as a button) to improve
user interaction (allowing some finger movement to stray outside of the form
control itself during the tap action). As part of this behaviour, browsers MAY
fire <code>gotpointercapture</code> and <code>lostpointercapture</code> events,
even though no explicit pointer capture functions
(<code>setPointerCapture</code> and <code>releasePointerCapture</code>) were
called."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 8 June 2014 00:39:08 UTC