- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 00:39:06 +0000
- To: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26013 Bug ID: 26013 Summary: Note in "10 Pointer Capture" to mention implicit pointer capture Product: PointerEventsWG Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Pointer Events specification Assignee: jrossi@microsoft.com Reporter: redux@splintered.co.uk QA Contact: public-pointer-events-bugzilla@w3.org CC: public-pointer-events@w3.org As discussed on list http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pointer-events/2014AprJun/0087.html I'd propose adding a note to "10. Pointer Capture" in the introductory section, after Fig 4: (slightly altered from my original suggestion) "NOTE: browsers MAY implement their own implicit pointer capture behaviour - for instance, for touch interactions, a browser may automatically capture the pointer as part of a tap on a native form control (such as a button) to improve user interaction (allowing some finger movement to stray outside of the form control itself during the tap action). As part of this behaviour, browsers MAY fire <code>gotpointercapture</code> and <code>lostpointercapture</code> events, even though no explicit pointer capture functions (<code>setPointerCapture</code> and <code>releasePointerCapture</code>) were called." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 8 June 2014 00:39:08 UTC