- From: <benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 15:22:10 +0000
- To: <SMyles@ap.org>, <phila@w3.org>
- CC: <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Thank you Stuart! Phil - I think you should add two use cases: a prohibition on web-scraping; and rate-limiting for APIs. Both are common use cases. Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: Myles, Stuart [mailto:SMyles@ap.org] > Sent: 06 September 2016 16:15 > To: Phil Archer; Whittam Smith, Benedict (TR Technology & Ops); public- > poe-wg@w3.org > Subject: RE: One by one, but not in bulk > > I think you'd need to figure out how you could express this "not in > bulk" requirement in terms that a machine could understand. > > > > For example, you might be able to express this as a restriction on how > frequently the API could be called. Or by imposing a limit to the > number of times it could be called within a given timeframe. (Both of > these are typical "rate limiting" strategies for APIs). > > > > Regards, > > > > Stuart > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2016 9:21 AM > > To: benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com; public-poe-wg@w3.org > > Subject: Re: One by one, but not in bulk > > > > > > > > On 06/09/2016 14:18, benedict.whittamsmith@thomsonreuters.com wrote: > > > Hi Phil, > > > > > > I think a odrl:Prohibition on screen-scraping would likely be a very > common requirement. I'm not sure if screen-scraping would come under > odrl:extract - but perhaps we can provide some guidance here. > > > > > > As to downloading one-by-one rather than by collection: does the API > provide two methods, one of which is prohibited? Seems a bit odd to me > at first glance. > > > > No, what I mean is you're not allowed to hit the API repeatedly and > thereby collect the full dataset, not that there's a big red button > marked "do not push!" > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > Ben > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Phil Archer [mailto:phila@w3.org] > > >> Sent: 06 September 2016 14:05 > > >> To: POE WG > > >> Subject: One by one, but not in bulk > > >> > > >> I had a quick look through the use cases but can't immediately > > >> identify one that covers one that just came up at a Big Data Europe > > >> meeting; so can I check whether this is new or already covered or > > >> doable in ODRL please? > > >> > > >> You can use our API to access one item at a time, but you may not > > >> download the full set as bulk (including by screen-scraping). > > >> > > >> Is this new? (it's definitely a real case). > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> Phil. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> > > >> Phil Archer > > >> W3C Data Activity Lead > > >> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > >> > > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > > >> 3A__philarcher.org&d=CwICaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk- > > >> > GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=GQ6xvz2BG1vCgiGGeLHdL1qJLbLUqYG6W19eFB > > >> lz > > >> > nzDGH3wjzyriGVJemENTKsgx&m=xUrZnBS5gfbR7wgzYE1s_Jm8ESkCE2psO4sSVTRBD9 > > >> k& s=XiuIAfz3FkSsJjzaa77Q5pkUQ0LgYEmqWKhX6kKO1YA&e= > > >> +44 (0)7887 767755 > > >> @philarcher1 > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Phil Archer > > W3C Data Activity Lead > > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- > 3A__philarcher.org&d=CwIGaQ&c=4ZIZThykDLcoWk- > GVjSLm9hvvvzvGv0FLoWSRuCSs5Q&r=GQ6xvz2BG1vCgiGGeLHdL1qJLbLUqYG6W19eFBlz > nzDGH3wjzyriGVJemENTKsgx&m=8YZef1IuWePBgyxkRbNVeZo6JsWxwwPr7X0iFFLSz3A& > s=2Y5OlnJT-0UkRkxLnVLti6ugm0kqzwbiP-_uvIX2jTM&e= > > +44 (0)7887 767755 > > @philarcher1 > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2016 15:23:10 UTC