- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 14:37:06 +0100
- To: "Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken" <pjohnston@wiley.com>, "Michael Steidl (IPTC)" <mdirector@iptc.org>
- Cc: 'W3C POE WG' <public-poe-wg@w3.org>
Hi Michael, I went back to the source (Keith Jeffery) who said: I think we need to say: Between date/time 1 and date/time 2 policy X is applied (note no foresight) And Between date/time 3 and date/time 4 policy Y is applied (date/time 3 may be the same as 2) And so on thus building up the provenance record set on policies. I have updated the wiki page to reduce Keith's example to: "The ability to express that permissions & obligations apply for a defined period of time." HTH Phil On 09/05/2016 14:03, Johnston, Patrick - Hoboken wrote: > From reading the use case, the implication is that it be released as open access post-embargo. Usually, for open data, this is CC zero (https://creativecommons.org/about/cc0/), so that’s the policy that should become active at that time. > > I admit I haven’t come across a dataset embargo — it’s usually the other way around — articles are often embargoed while the data is released unencumbered pre-publication (this could be on a preprint server, or on a domain-specific repository), in particular for government-sponsored research initially published in a subscription-only journal. There are occasions where the data will not be released until publication, in which case it is a conditional embargo that depends on an event. I can write these up as separate use cases. > > Patrick Johnston (magyarblip) > John Wiley & Sons > > From: "Michael Steidl (IPTC)" <mdirector@iptc.org<mailto:mdirector@iptc.org>> > Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 at 6:37 AM > To: 'Phil Archer' <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>> > Cc: W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-poe-wg@w3.org>> > Subject: POE: question on a Use Case > Resent-From: W3C POE WG <public-poe-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-poe-wg@w3.org>> > Resent-Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 at 6:55 AM > > Hi Phil, > you have posted this use case: https://www.w3.org/2016/poe/wiki/Use_Cases#POE.UC.03_Published_article_with_embargoed_dataset > > I have a question regarding the raised requirement: is it required to introduce a specific new policy for the “change on a future date” or is it ok to indicate: “will change in some way”. > > Please let us know. > Thanks, > Michael > > Michael Steidl > Managing Director of the IPTC [mdirector@iptc.org<mailto:mdirector@iptc.org>] > International Press Telecommunications Council > Web: www.iptc.org<http://www.iptc.org/> - on Twitter @IPTC<http://www.twitter.com/IPTC> > Business office address: > 25 Southampton Buildings, London WC2A 1AL, United Kingdom > Registered in England, company no 101096 > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2016 13:37:16 UTC