- From: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:14:17 +0200
- To: Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com>
- Cc: public-poe-comments@w3.org
Received on Monday, 27 March 2017 17:15:33 UTC
Thanks Renato, I think a mapping from Readium LCP rights to ODRL is therefore feasible. Laurent Le Meur CTO, EDRLab > Le 27 mars 2017 à 03:15, Renato Iannella <renato.iannella@monegraph.com> a écrit : > > >> On 23 Mar 2017, at 19:49, Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org <mailto:laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>> wrote: >> >> * "start" and "end" dates can be mapped to a "Period" I guess, or a Datetime + a Delay Period, but I'm missing details about the use of Periods in odrl-vocab 4.20.6 (#term-dateTime). >> Maybe the WG could enhance the spec on this odrl-vocab 4.20.6 (#term-dateTime) aspect, re. Period. > > Thanks for the feedback. > > We have identified an issue with time periods: https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/118 <https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/118> > > Our proposal would be to only use dateTime for explicit dates (not periods). > > In the case of LCP, start and end dates would use odrl:dateTime with the “odrl:gteq” and “odrl:lteq” operators. > > > Renato Iannella, Monegraph > Co-Chair, W3C Permissions & Obligations Expression (POE) Working Group >
Received on Monday, 27 March 2017 17:15:33 UTC