[poe] Issue: possible error in OWL ORDL ontology? marked as PR Review

iherman has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as "PR Review":

== possible error in OWL ORDL ontology? ==
(Recording the [mail of Kerry Taylor](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poe-wg/2018Jan/0003.html) as an issue)

Very nice work POE team. I think this is important work that needed to get out there!
I am looking at https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#actionConcepts
And I see that “The includedIn property is transitive, and as such, the Actions form ancestor relationships.”
In contrast I see  here: https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ODRL22.ttl that

a rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:SymmetricProperty, skos:Concept ;”

I think perhaps the “owl:SymmetricProperty” in here should be, instead, “owl:TransitiveProperty”?
Btw,  there is a tiny typo here: ” A Policy class MUST be disjoint will all Policy subclasses (except for Set).” In https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-odrl-model-20180104/.

Cc: @riannella 

See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/289

Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 08:13:05 UTC