- From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:13:02 +0000
- To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
iherman has just labeled an issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe as "PR Review": == possible error in OWL ORDL ontology? == (Recording the [mail of Kerry Taylor](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poe-wg/2018Jan/0003.html) as an issue) Very nice work POE team. I think this is important work that needed to get out there! I am looking at https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#actionConcepts And I see that “The includedIn property is transitive, and as such, the Actions form ancestor relationships.” In contrast I see here: https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ODRL22.ttl that “:includedIn ``` a rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:SymmetricProperty, skos:Concept ;” ``` I think perhaps the “owl:SymmetricProperty” in here should be, instead, “owl:TransitiveProperty”? Btw, there is a tiny typo here: ” A Policy class MUST be disjoint will all Policy subclasses (except for Set).” In https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-odrl-model-20180104/. Yours Kerry Cc: @riannella See https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/289
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 08:13:05 UTC