W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-poe-archives@w3.org > January 2018

[poe] possible error in OWL ORDL ontology?

From: Ivan Herman via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 08:13:01 +0000
To: public-poe-archives@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-288818253-1516090380-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
iherman has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/poe:

== possible error in OWL ORDL ontology? ==
(Recording the [mail of Kerry Taylor](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-poe-wg/2018Jan/0003.html) as an issue)

Very nice work POE team. I think this is important work that needed to get out there!
I am looking at https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#actionConcepts
And I see that “The includedIn property is transitive, and as such, the Actions form ancestor relationships.”
In contrast I see  here: https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ODRL22.ttl that

a rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:SymmetricProperty, skos:Concept ;”

I think perhaps the “owl:SymmetricProperty” in here should be, instead, “owl:TransitiveProperty”?
Btw,  there is a tiny typo here: ” A Policy class MUST be disjoint will all Policy subclasses (except for Set).” In https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-odrl-model-20180104/.

Cc: @riannella 

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/poe/issues/289 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 08:13:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:47:04 UTC