possible error in OWL ORDL ontology?

Very nice work POE team. I think this is important work that needed to get out there!

I am looking at https://www.w3.org/TR/odrl-vocab/#actionConcepts
And I see that "The includedIn property is transitive, and as such, the Actions form ancestor relationships."

In contrast I see  here: https://www.w3.org/ns/odrl/2/ODRL22.ttl that
":includedIn
                a rdf:Property, owl:ObjectProperty, owl:SymmetricProperty, skos:Concept ;"

I think perhaps the "owl:SymmetricProperty" in here should be, instead, "owl:TransitiveProperty"?


Btw,  there is a tiny typo here: " A Policy class MUST be disjoint will all Policy subclasses (except for Set)." In https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/PR-odrl-model-20180104/.

Yours,
Kerry

Dr Kerry Taylor
-Associate Professor (Data Science)
-Convenor of Postgraduate Programs in Applied Data Analytics
-Convenor of Bachelor of Applied Data Analytics
-Chair of W3C/OGC Spatial Data on the Web Working Group
Research School of Computer Science
ANU College of Engineering and Computer Science
Canberra ACT 2601 Australia
+61 2 6125 8560