Re: [PNG] Meeting minutes - Jun 10th, 2024

Oh! I found the (publicly available, yay) prior liaising
<https://github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/issues/366#issuecomment-1799765436>.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:51 AM Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <
programmax@gmail.com> wrote:

> There was an official liaison discussion. The GitHub discussion is the
> result of that.
> Although, I don't see it in the public mailing list archive.
> Out of an abundance of caution, I'll be careful what I say about it here.
> (It is probably fine but no reason to risk it.)
>
> IIRC the last update of the liaising was some questions we had. I'm not
> sure we heard back on those. It was a while ago so we can rekindle that
> flame.
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:39 AM Fares Alhassen <falhassen@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In regard to " Any updates from ISO TC 42 (Photography) / WG18
>> (Electronic still picture imaging)
>> gainmap proposal (ISO 21496-1)? Is our communication still strong? Is
>> there a free
>> public version available?":
>>
>> The draft proposal is confidential and there is no public version
>> available yet.
>>
>> We need to establish an official liaison between the PNG group and ISO
>> TC42 WG18. The GitHub discussion earlier about ISO 21496-1 is not
>> considered an official liaison discussion.
>>
>> Once there is a liaison established between the groups, we should be able
>> to share the draft ISO 21496-1 spec to the PNG group so that we can develop
>> PNG 4 gainmap spec to be fully compliant with ISO 21496-1 gainmaps.
>>
>> I am happy to drive the liaison process, starting with application at the
>> W3C level first.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Fares
>>
>> PS there is WiFi on my flight
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024, 8:29 AM Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Apologies for my absence. I'm travelling, was preparing for the CSS f2f
>>> tomorrow, and mixed up the times.
>>>
>>> Going forward I will be in Europe f(but working afternoons and evenings)
>>> or the next 3 months, so a new time might be more convenient.
>>>
>>> On 2024-06-10 11:21, Chris Blume (ProgramMax) wrote:
>>> > Attendance was a problem. I know one person was on a flight and
>>> > another had an event.
>>> > Our current meeting time is inconvenient for both Europe and
>>> > California. It was chosen in an effort to be inclusive for both.
>>> > Should we reconsider and find a new time?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chris Lilley
>>> @svgeesus
>>> Technical Director @ W3C
>>> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
>>> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>>>
>>>
>>>