Re: [PNG] Meeting minutes - Jun 10th, 2024

Thanks so much, Chris! Let me bring this up with the ISO group and see if I
can share an updated draft of the proposal.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024, 8:56 AM Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <programmax@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Oh! I found the (publicly available, yay) prior liaising
> <https://github.com/w3c/PNG-spec/issues/366#issuecomment-1799765436>.
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:51 AM Chris Blume (ProgramMax) <
> programmax@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> There was an official liaison discussion. The GitHub discussion is the
>> result of that.
>> Although, I don't see it in the public mailing list archive.
>> Out of an abundance of caution, I'll be careful what I say about it here.
>> (It is probably fine but no reason to risk it.)
>>
>> IIRC the last update of the liaising was some questions we had. I'm not
>> sure we heard back on those. It was a while ago so we can rekindle that
>> flame.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:39 AM Fares Alhassen <falhassen@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> In regard to " Any updates from ISO TC 42 (Photography) / WG18
>>> (Electronic still picture imaging)
>>> gainmap proposal (ISO 21496-1)? Is our communication still strong? Is
>>> there a free
>>> public version available?":
>>>
>>> The draft proposal is confidential and there is no public version
>>> available yet.
>>>
>>> We need to establish an official liaison between the PNG group and ISO
>>> TC42 WG18. The GitHub discussion earlier about ISO 21496-1 is not
>>> considered an official liaison discussion.
>>>
>>> Once there is a liaison established between the groups, we should be
>>> able to share the draft ISO 21496-1 spec to the PNG group so that we can
>>> develop PNG 4 gainmap spec to be fully compliant with ISO 21496-1 gainmaps.
>>>
>>> I am happy to drive the liaison process, starting with application at
>>> the W3C level first.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Fares
>>>
>>> PS there is WiFi on my flight
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024, 8:29 AM Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Apologies for my absence. I'm travelling, was preparing for the CSS f2f
>>>> tomorrow, and mixed up the times.
>>>>
>>>> Going forward I will be in Europe f(but working afternoons and
>>>> evenings)
>>>> or the next 3 months, so a new time might be more convenient.
>>>>
>>>> On 2024-06-10 11:21, Chris Blume (ProgramMax) wrote:
>>>> > Attendance was a problem. I know one person was on a flight and
>>>> > another had an event.
>>>> > Our current meeting time is inconvenient for both Europe and
>>>> > California. It was chosen in an effort to be inclusive for both.
>>>> > Should we reconsider and find a new time?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Lilley
>>>> @svgeesus
>>>> Technical Director @ W3C
>>>> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
>>>> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>