Re: [PNG] Meeting minutes - Jun 10th, 2024

There was an official liaison discussion. The GitHub discussion is the
result of that.
Although, I don't see it in the public mailing list archive.
Out of an abundance of caution, I'll be careful what I say about it here.
(It is probably fine but no reason to risk it.)

IIRC the last update of the liaising was some questions we had. I'm not
sure we heard back on those. It was a while ago so we can rekindle that
flame.

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:39 AM Fares Alhassen <falhassen@google.com>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> In regard to " Any updates from ISO TC 42 (Photography) / WG18 (Electronic
> still picture imaging)
> gainmap proposal (ISO 21496-1)? Is our communication still strong? Is
> there a free
> public version available?":
>
> The draft proposal is confidential and there is no public version
> available yet.
>
> We need to establish an official liaison between the PNG group and ISO
> TC42 WG18. The GitHub discussion earlier about ISO 21496-1 is not
> considered an official liaison discussion.
>
> Once there is a liaison established between the groups, we should be able
> to share the draft ISO 21496-1 spec to the PNG group so that we can develop
> PNG 4 gainmap spec to be fully compliant with ISO 21496-1 gainmaps.
>
> I am happy to drive the liaison process, starting with application at the
> W3C level first.
>
> Sincerely,
> Fares
>
> PS there is WiFi on my flight
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024, 8:29 AM Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> Apologies for my absence. I'm travelling, was preparing for the CSS f2f
>> tomorrow, and mixed up the times.
>>
>> Going forward I will be in Europe f(but working afternoons and evenings)
>> or the next 3 months, so a new time might be more convenient.
>>
>> On 2024-06-10 11:21, Chris Blume (ProgramMax) wrote:
>> > Attendance was a problem. I know one person was on a flight and
>> > another had an event.
>> > Our current meeting time is inconvenient for both Europe and
>> > California. It was chosen in an effort to be inclusive for both.
>> > Should we reconsider and find a new time?
>>
>> --
>> Chris Lilley
>> @svgeesus
>> Technical Director @ W3C
>> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
>> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
>>
>>
>>