- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:54:12 +0100
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>, Paul Denning <pauld@mitre.org>, public-pling@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 10:54:19 UTC
Dear all, Having done P3P and being part of the PRIME EU Project, I can tell you that requirements are the wrong discussion. We have to start discussing use cases that will create requirements. Some parts of the requirements generated that way are already implemented by SAML, XACML, kerberos and the like. Other things are more cutting edge. So instead of starting to talk about a general negotiation framework, I would rather start to discuss the very concrete issue we to solve. Best, Rigo On Wednesday 21 November 2007, ashok malhotra wrote: > Policy Negotiation was not in the charter of WS-Policy. But, more > importantly, although several people were interested, > no one was able to put forward a coherent description of > requirements in this area. If we want to move forward on this, > someone shd take a stab at setting out what we need. [..] > Renato Iannella wrote: [...] > > > > Some work in this area - related to rights policy negotiation - > > may help: > > > > > > http://people.cs.uct.ac.za/~aarnab/drm/papers/Arnab-Hutchison-DMP-IDP-3-Proposal.pdf
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2007 10:54:19 UTC