Re: Is it necessary for the semantic web to be self contradictory?

Missing reference, what is the distinction before “Form” and “forms”?
But the Semantic Web is a web of utterances by distributed players which are all intrinsically ambiguous and highly likely to be full of contradictions and differences of opinion.
The main ‘invention’ of the web (and Gopher before it) was the distributed authority of having uncoordinated but linked data resources. A semantic WEB needs the same freedom for different serves to make contradictory assertions… is that what you mean?

Larry
—
http://larry.masinter.net




http://masinter.blogspot.com/2014/11/ambiguity-semantic-web-speech-acts.html


On 5/26/15, 1:59 PM, "Melvin Carvalho" <melvincarvalho@gmail.com<mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com>> wrote:

I was reading this quote lately:

In order for the Global Semantic System to be able to produce creative utterances, it is necessary that it be self-contradictory and that no Form of content exist, only forms of content

I was wondering if it applies also the semantic web and decentralization.