- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 13:02:04 -0500
- To: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Joseph Scheuhammer'" <clown@alum.mit.edu>, public-pfwg@w3.org
Tables should not support selection. It is just a table. Rich Schwerdtfeger From: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com> To: "'Joseph Scheuhammer'" <clown@alum.mit.edu>, <public-pfwg@w3.org> Date: 10/01/2015 11:06 AM Subject: RE: issue-633 Updates to grid and gridcell roles I saw that comment in the code. I don't think we need to focus on selection in the short description. Practically all interactive widgets support it and we do not consistently call it out in the short description. It is enough to say that the grid is a widget and supports navigation. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Scheuhammer [mailto:clown@alum.mit.edu] Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 7:41 AM To: public-pfwg@w3.org Subject: Re: issue-633 Updates to grid and gridcell roles Hi Matt, There is an editor's note in the master branch that states (my emphasis): " Now that 1.1 will include a table role, we need to differentiate the short description more sufficiently. Emphasize that grids are "interactive" tables that *maintain a selection state*." One of the states that grid supports is aria-multiselectable, but this is absent in the case of the table role. Similarly, the gridcell role supports aria-selected, but the cell role does not. This is one of the main differences between grids/gridells and tables/cells, and it should be underscored up front. But, I'm having a tough time trying to fit it into the new short description. How about: "A composite widget that supports a selection model, containing one or more rows with one or more cells where some or all of the cells in the grid are focusable using two-dimensional navigation, such as by directional arrow keys." -- ;;;;joseph. 'Array(16).join("wat" - 1) + " Batman!"' - G. Bernhardt -
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 2015 18:02:51 UTC