- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:43:37 -0600
- To: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: public-pfwg@w3.org, "'Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken'" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Message-ID: <OF1F063FD4.38DFCA46-ON86257F0D.0050BC11-86257F0D.0050E5E4@us.ibm.com>
John,
I hear what you are saying but that is not how they are used in the real
world. Steve looked into it.
We used to have a labelledby relationship and Steve asked me to change it.
I suggest you both speak with Steve as he had to deal with it in HTML5.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com>
To: "'Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken'" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Richard
Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Date: 11/30/2015 08:40 AM
Subject: RE: Action-1734, Action-1708, Action-1709: Proposal for a
Figure Role
+1
Captions are not long descriptions, and long descriptions are not captions:
different content, often different audience member.
JF
From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken [mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 8:35 AM
To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>; public-pfwg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Action-1734, Action-1708, Action-1709: Proposal for a Figure
Role
Hi Rich,
I understand that this question is regarding a specialized case (multiple
images in one <figure> element). Please realize that the described scenario
is very common in publishing. Further, publishing almost never uses
<figcaption> in lieu of descriptions. Rather, we use it to caption images
in publications. We have textbooks, journals, magazines, etc. with hundreds
of captioned images that need both descriptions and captions. It is
important to be able to provide both without confusion.
Tzviya
Tzviya Siegman
Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead
Wiley
201-748-6884
tsiegman@wiley.com
From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 12:45 PM
To: public-pfwg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Action-1734, Action-1708, Action-1709: Proposal for a Figure
Role
Hi Jason,
This is in response to this post from you:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Oct/0025.html and my
action item 1734.
I spoke with Steve Faulkner and he stated captions were more being used as
descriptions and not basic captions. Consequently He had asked that a
reference to a caption be a reference to a description and by default this
meant an aria-describedby mapping to the long description. In HTML Steve
was going to map <caption> through an aria-describedby relationship.
... Note: we are talking about extended descriptions in which case we would
not want the results to be stringified and I think we can address this by
placing a new type of extended Role attribute on the caption area.
Rich
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Monday, 30 November 2015 14:44:12 UTC