- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:43:37 -0600
- To: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Cc: public-pfwg@w3.org, "'Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken'" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Message-ID: <OF1F063FD4.38DFCA46-ON86257F0D.0050BC11-86257F0D.0050E5E4@us.ibm.com>
John, I hear what you are saying but that is not how they are used in the real world. Steve looked into it. We used to have a labelledby relationship and Steve asked me to change it. I suggest you both speak with Steve as he had to deal with it in HTML5. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger From: "John Foliot" <john.foliot@deque.com> To: "'Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken'" <tsiegman@wiley.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, <public-pfwg@w3.org> Date: 11/30/2015 08:40 AM Subject: RE: Action-1734, Action-1708, Action-1709: Proposal for a Figure Role +1 Captions are not long descriptions, and long descriptions are not captions: different content, often different audience member. JF From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken [mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com] Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 8:35 AM To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>; public-pfwg@w3.org Subject: RE: Action-1734, Action-1708, Action-1709: Proposal for a Figure Role Hi Rich, I understand that this question is regarding a specialized case (multiple images in one <figure> element). Please realize that the described scenario is very common in publishing. Further, publishing almost never uses <figcaption> in lieu of descriptions. Rather, we use it to caption images in publications. We have textbooks, journals, magazines, etc. with hundreds of captioned images that need both descriptions and captions. It is important to be able to provide both without confusion. Tzviya Tzviya Siegman Digital Book Standards & Capabilities Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2015 12:45 PM To: public-pfwg@w3.org Subject: Re: Action-1734, Action-1708, Action-1709: Proposal for a Figure Role Hi Jason, This is in response to this post from you: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2015Oct/0025.html and my action item 1734. I spoke with Steve Faulkner and he stated captions were more being used as descriptions and not basic captions. Consequently He had asked that a reference to a caption be a reference to a description and by default this meant an aria-describedby mapping to the long description. In HTML Steve was going to map <caption> through an aria-describedby relationship. ... Note: we are talking about extended descriptions in which case we would not want the results to be stringified and I think we can address this by placing a new type of extended Role attribute on the caption area. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Monday, 30 November 2015 14:44:12 UTC