- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 09:34:15 -0500
- To: Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl>
- Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, public-pfwg@w3.org
We discussed it at the meeting on the 15th. Sadly the minutes [1] seem to not have captured much of that discussion. My own recollection is that I raised your concern and the conclusion was to not change it to SHOULD, but leave it as MAY. I'll let others fill in the blanks or correct me if my recollection is incorrect. --joanie [1] http://www.w3.org/2015/10/15-aria-minutes.html On 11/11/2015 05:02 AM, Michiel Bijl wrote: > I never got a reply to this, and it still says MAY in the draft. If Iâm > wrong, please let me know :) > > âMichiel > >> On 15 Oct 2015, at 12:05, Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl >> <mailto:michiel@agosto.nl>> wrote: >> >> Shouldnât this be a SHOULD: >> >>> Authors *MAY* reference text serving as a caption using aria-describedby. >> >> Anything non textual should have some form of a description/caption right? >> >> âMichiel >> >>> On 15 Oct 2015, at 00:01, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com >>> <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hey Joseph. >>> >>> On 10/08/2015 02:59 PM, Joseph Scheuhammer wrote: >>>> One nit regarding labels, and that is to allow aria-label: >>>> >>>> "Authors MAY reference text serving as a caption using aria-describedby >>>> and MAY provide a label using aria-label or reference text using >>>> aria-labelledby." >>> >>> Change made (though I broke it into two sentences). >>> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action-1714/aria/aria.html#figure >>> >>> Thanks! >>> --joanie >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 14:36:18 UTC