Re: Action-1708, Action-1709: Proposal for a Figure Role

I never got a reply to this, and it still says MAY in the draft. If I’m wrong, please let me know :)

—Michiel

> On 15 Oct 2015, at 12:05, Michiel Bijl <michiel@agosto.nl> wrote:
> 
> Shouldn’t this be a SHOULD:
> 
>> Authors MAY reference text serving as a caption using aria-describedby.
> 
> Anything non textual should have some form of a description/caption right?
> 
> —Michiel
> 
>> On 15 Oct 2015, at 00:01, Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com <mailto:jdiggs@igalia.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey Joseph.
>> 
>> On 10/08/2015 02:59 PM, Joseph Scheuhammer wrote:
>>> One nit regarding labels, and that is to allow aria-label:
>>> 
>>> "Authors MAY reference text serving as a caption using aria-describedby
>>> and MAY provide a label using aria-label or reference text using
>>> aria-labelledby."
>> 
>> Change made (though I broke it into two sentences).
>> https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action-1714/aria/aria.html#figure <https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/action-1714/aria/aria.html#figure>
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> --joanie
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 10:03:52 UTC