Re: ARIA Extensions Definitional Statement

Sorry I missed the discussion.  Optional modules?  Huh.

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:

> A further thought to today's PF discussion on the ARIA Extension
> statement ..:
>
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/wiki/ARIAExtensions
>
> May I suggest we tweak the top statement about HTML's extension
> specification to say:
>
> "Note: This model is based upon, but diverges from the HTML Working
> Group's model for Extension specifications."
>
> As we discussed today, we're steering toward optional modules, and HTML
> extensions are not optional.
>
> Janina
>
> --
>
> Janina Sajka,   Phone:  +1.443.300.2200
>                         sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
>                 Email:  janina@rednote.net
>
> Linux Foundation Fellow
> Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:       http://a11y.org
>
> The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
> Chair,  Protocols & Formats     http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.