- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:35:21 -0600
- To: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
- Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <OF6B73696B.E9BD7932-ON86257DEF.00710FDD-86257DEF.007119E2@us.ibm.com>
James, beginning with what version of IE is querySelector supported?
Rich Schwerdtfeger
From: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Dominic Mazzoni
<dmazzoni@google.com>
Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Date: 02/17/2015 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: make aria-owns to rearrange children
I like the querySelector idea - it would give a great deal of flexibility.
On 2/17/2015 9:36 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
I think I like the idea to use querySelector for aria-owns value (for
all idrefs attributes?).
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Dominic Mazzoni <
dmazzoni@google.com> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:09 AM, James Nurthen <
james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote:
One issue with aria-owns is that as soon as you start to use it
you end up with a massive number of idrefs.
We discussed this problem a while back in the context of web
components, and there were at least two possible solutions I
thought could work:
* Expose reflected attributes on an Element, allowing for example:
parent.ariaOwns = [child3, child2, child1]; or
parent.ariaActiveDescendant = child2;
* Alllow a querySelector string in place of an idref, for example
<tr aria-owns="query(.leftcells .rightcells)"> or <div
aria-activedescendant="query([tabIndex='0'])">.
Are you still interested in pursuing either of those, or even both?
I might like to try implementing one of those behind a flag if the
group can come to a tentative consensus.
FWIW, I like Alexander's idea of allowing aria-owns for sibling
relationships. I think we should do it either way, and then solve
the IDREF problem in general.
- Dominic
Something I would like to be able to do is reference a parent node
(with role=presentation) in aria-owns with the effect that its
children would be owned.
One place we hit this a lot is in grids with multiple scrollable
regions. So, currently, in the following 2 rows table with 2
scrollable regions, we have the following structure.
<tr role="row" aria-owns="r1c1 r1c2 r1c3 r1c4 r1c5 r1c6">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c1">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c2">
</tr>
<tr role="row" aria-owns="r2c1 r2c2 r2c3 r2c4 r2c5 r2c6">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c1">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c2">
</tr>
<tr role="presentation">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c3">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c4">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c5">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c6">
</tr>
<tr role="presentation">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c3">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c4">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c5">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c6">
</tr>
What I would like to be able to (which I would like to have the
same result in the API mapping) is the following
<tr role="row" aria-owns="r1c1 r1c2 r1">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c1">
<td role="gridcell" id="r1c2">
</tr>
<tr role="row" aria-owns="r2c1 r2c2 r2">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c1">
<td role="gridcell" id="r2c2">
</tr>
<tr role="presentation" id="r1">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
</tr>
<tr role="presentation" id="r2">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
</tr>
Or, taking it one step further, allow aria-owns to reference
itself, which would place the natural children of the element into
the ownership at that point in the order so I could do:
<tr role="row" aria-owns="t1r1 t2r1" id="t1r1">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
</tr>
<tr role="row" aria-owns="t1r2 t2r2" id="t1r2">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
</tr>
<tr role="presentation" id="t2r1">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
</tr>
<tr role="presentation" id="t2r2">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
<td role="gridcell">
</tr>
If people like this idea I would be happy to come up with some
spec text to allow it.
Regards,
James
On 2/15/2015 8:07 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
Hi.
aria-owns is used to define parent-child relationship [1].
The spec says nothing how aria-owns affects on
between-siblings relations, i.e. where aria-owns children
have to be in the hierarchy. So there's no way for the
author to control the ordering of explicit and aria-owns
children. The idea [2] was to let aria-owns to refer its own
children to change the ordering. For example,
<div role="grid"
<div role="row" aria-owns="c1 c2 c3 c4">
<div role="gridcell" id="c1">cell1</div>
<div role="gridcell" id="c2">cell1</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- somewhere in the DOM -->
<div role="gridcell" id="c3">cell1</div>
<div role="gridcell" id="c4">cell1</div>
In this case role="row" would contain 4 cells in the order
specified by aria-owns.
If the idea looks reasonable then the spec could be changed
this way
Insert after existing wording:
"The value of the aria-owns attribute is a space-separated
list of IDREFS that reference one or more elements in the
document by ID."
something like:
"The order the referred elements listed in the value should
be preserved when their parent-child relationship is set.
All explicit unreferred children should be considered
followed aria-owns elements."
Thanks.
Alexander.
[1]
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/states_and_properties#aria-owns
[2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133213
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2015 20:36:53 UTC