- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:35:21 -0600
- To: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
- Cc: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <OF6B73696B.E9BD7932-ON86257DEF.00710FDD-86257DEF.007119E2@us.ibm.com>
James, beginning with what version of IE is querySelector supported? Rich Schwerdtfeger From: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com> To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com> Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org> Date: 02/17/2015 11:56 AM Subject: Re: make aria-owns to rearrange children I like the querySelector idea - it would give a great deal of flexibility. On 2/17/2015 9:36 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: I think I like the idea to use querySelector for aria-owns value (for all idrefs attributes?). On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Dominic Mazzoni < dmazzoni@google.com> wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:09 AM, James Nurthen < james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote: One issue with aria-owns is that as soon as you start to use it you end up with a massive number of idrefs. We discussed this problem a while back in the context of web components, and there were at least two possible solutions I thought could work: * Expose reflected attributes on an Element, allowing for example: parent.ariaOwns = [child3, child2, child1]; or parent.ariaActiveDescendant = child2; * Alllow a querySelector string in place of an idref, for example <tr aria-owns="query(.leftcells .rightcells)"> or <div aria-activedescendant="query([tabIndex='0'])">. Are you still interested in pursuing either of those, or even both? I might like to try implementing one of those behind a flag if the group can come to a tentative consensus. FWIW, I like Alexander's idea of allowing aria-owns for sibling relationships. I think we should do it either way, and then solve the IDREF problem in general. - Dominic Something I would like to be able to do is reference a parent node (with role=presentation) in aria-owns with the effect that its children would be owned. One place we hit this a lot is in grids with multiple scrollable regions. So, currently, in the following 2 rows table with 2 scrollable regions, we have the following structure. <tr role="row" aria-owns="r1c1 r1c2 r1c3 r1c4 r1c5 r1c6"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c1"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c2"> </tr> <tr role="row" aria-owns="r2c1 r2c2 r2c3 r2c4 r2c5 r2c6"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c1"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c2"> </tr> <tr role="presentation"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c3"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c4"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c5"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c6"> </tr> <tr role="presentation"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c3"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c4"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c5"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c6"> </tr> What I would like to be able to (which I would like to have the same result in the API mapping) is the following <tr role="row" aria-owns="r1c1 r1c2 r1"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c1"> <td role="gridcell" id="r1c2"> </tr> <tr role="row" aria-owns="r2c1 r2c2 r2"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c1"> <td role="gridcell" id="r2c2"> </tr> <tr role="presentation" id="r1"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> </tr> <tr role="presentation" id="r2"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> </tr> Or, taking it one step further, allow aria-owns to reference itself, which would place the natural children of the element into the ownership at that point in the order so I could do: <tr role="row" aria-owns="t1r1 t2r1" id="t1r1"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> </tr> <tr role="row" aria-owns="t1r2 t2r2" id="t1r2"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> </tr> <tr role="presentation" id="t2r1"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> </tr> <tr role="presentation" id="t2r2"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> <td role="gridcell"> </tr> If people like this idea I would be happy to come up with some spec text to allow it. Regards, James On 2/15/2015 8:07 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote: Hi. aria-owns is used to define parent-child relationship [1]. The spec says nothing how aria-owns affects on between-siblings relations, i.e. where aria-owns children have to be in the hierarchy. So there's no way for the author to control the ordering of explicit and aria-owns children. The idea [2] was to let aria-owns to refer its own children to change the ordering. For example, <div role="grid" <div role="row" aria-owns="c1 c2 c3 c4"> <div role="gridcell" id="c1">cell1</div> <div role="gridcell" id="c2">cell1</div> </div> </div> <!-- somewhere in the DOM --> <div role="gridcell" id="c3">cell1</div> <div role="gridcell" id="c4">cell1</div> In this case role="row" would contain 4 cells in the order specified by aria-owns. If the idea looks reasonable then the spec could be changed this way Insert after existing wording: "The value of the aria-owns attribute is a space-separated list of IDREFS that reference one or more elements in the document by ID." something like: "The order the referred elements listed in the value should be preserved when their parent-child relationship is set. All explicit unreferred children should be considered followed aria-owns elements." Thanks. Alexander. [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/states_and_properties#aria-owns [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1133213
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2015 20:36:53 UTC