- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 13:14:41 -0800
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 11/3/2014 3:38 PM, James Craig wrote: >>> On Nov 3, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: >>> >>> James Craig writes: >>>> Substantive details should always first be discussed on list, not in the phone meetings. Phone calls should only be for recurring issues that cannot be resolved on the list. >>>> >>> OK, now we might be getting somewhere. >>> >>> This is not an unfamiliar argument. It's the modus operandi for HTML-WG, >>> for example. However, it would be a major cultural change for PF. >> The change would also allow for more inclusive participation from individuals with hearing impairments. Currently the PF process does not allow for effective participation form hearing-impaired contributors. > Both captioning and interpreting are possibilities as the need arises. A dedicated stenographer or professional scribe for WAI meetings would be very beneficial even if we did not have a dedicated accessibility need. No one in the group is such a talented typist that we can scribe topics verbatim. Much context is lost in the meeting minutes.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 21:15:09 UTC