- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:59:08 -0500
- To: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- CC: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
On 11/3/2014 3:38 PM, James Craig wrote: >> On Nov 3, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: >> >> James Craig writes: >>> Substantive details should always first be discussed on list, not in the phone meetings. Phone calls should only be for recurring issues that cannot be resolved on the list. >>> >> OK, now we might be getting somewhere. >> >> This is not an unfamiliar argument. It's the modus operandi for HTML-WG, >> for example. However, it would be a major cultural change for PF. > The change would also allow for more inclusive participation from individuals with hearing impairments. Currently the PF process does not allow for effective participation form hearing-impaired contributors. Both captioning and interpreting are possibilities as the need arises. >> Personally, I don't agree that it would be positive for PF. In my >> experience, we get much more done when we talk to each other. >> Furthermore, it's my experience we have many more misunderstandings via >> etext alone. Sounds like would be useful to hear from other ARIA TF participants at the next meeting, to establish more of a shared understanding of what works for effective ARIA TF progress. - Judy >> >> Janina >> >
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 20:59:24 UTC