- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:38:21 -0800
- To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
> On Nov 3, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > > James Craig writes: >> Substantive details should always first be discussed on list, not in the phone meetings. Phone calls should only be for recurring issues that cannot be resolved on the list. >> > OK, now we might be getting somewhere. > > This is not an unfamiliar argument. It's the modus operandi for HTML-WG, > for example. However, it would be a major cultural change for PF. The change would also allow for more inclusive participation from individuals with hearing impairments. Currently the PF process does not allow for effective participation form hearing-impaired contributors. > Personally, I don't agree that it would be positive for PF. In my > experience, we get much more done when we talk to each other. > Furthermore, it's my experience we have many more misunderstandings via > etext alone. > > Janina >
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 20:38:47 UTC