Re: PF editors

Based on Michael's detailed email covering the pros and cons I also agree
with github and respec. Also, github is used by a lot of software
developers. As we bring in new people it will be helpful to provide them
with a tool they are familiar with.


Rich Schwerdtfeger

From:	Shane McCarron <>
To:	Steve Faulkner <>
Cc:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, "W3C WAI Protocols &
            Formats" <>, Michael Cooper <>,
            Mark Sadecki <>, Joseph Scheuhammer
Date:	03/26/2014 10:19 AM
Subject:	Re: PF editors
Sent by:

I agree that github and respec is the way to go moving forward.

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Steve Faulkner <>
  Hi all,

  Regrets I cannot make the meeting today.

  My preference is to use Github and Respec as that is what I use for other
  docs I edit (html5 etc). Its a workflow I am familiar with.



  HTML 5.1

  On 25 March 2014 20:33, Richard Schwerdtfeger <> wrote:

   Thank for your detailed collection of options/pro-cons for the UAIG
   suite of documents.

   I am not a member of the PF editors list so Janina pointed me to this.
   We should move pf-editing to a public space list. For now, I am posting
   this to public-pwfg space.

   I know PF's name is also changing so we will be getting a whole new set
   of lists.


   Rich Schwerdtfeger

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 15:30:27 UTC