W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg@w3.org > March 2014

Re: PF editors

From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:18:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOk_reEvDuA7e=xJdZtJAvA0Wm8o6BqQ84BFK74Mopyz4uE12Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
I agree that github and respec is the way to go moving forward.


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Regrets I cannot make the meeting today.
>
> My preference is to use Github and Respec as that is what I use for other
> docs I edit (html5 etc). Its a workflow I am familiar with.
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
>
> On 25 March 2014 20:33, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>  Michael,
>>
>> Thank for your detailed collection of options/pro-cons for the UAIG suite
>> of documents.
>>
>> I am not a member of the PF editors list so Janina pointed me to this. We
>> should move pf-editing to a public space list. For now, I am posting this
>> to public-pwfg space.
>>
>>
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-pf-editors/2014JanMar/0006.html
>>
>> I know PF's name is also changing so we will be getting a whole new set
>> of lists.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 15:19:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:45:01 UTC