Re: PF editors

I agree that github and respec is the way to go moving forward.


On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Regrets I cannot make the meeting today.
>
> My preference is to use Github and Respec as that is what I use for other
> docs I edit (html5 etc). Its a workflow I am familiar with.
>
> --
>
> Regards
>
> SteveF
> HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
>
>
> On 25 March 2014 20:33, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>  Michael,
>>
>> Thank for your detailed collection of options/pro-cons for the UAIG suite
>> of documents.
>>
>> I am not a member of the PF editors list so Janina pointed me to this. We
>> should move pf-editing to a public space list. For now, I am posting this
>> to public-pwfg space.
>>
>>
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-pf-editors/2014JanMar/0006.html
>>
>> I know PF's name is also changing so we will be getting a whole new set
>> of lists.
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 15:19:04 UTC