+1 to ReSpec and GitHub. I don’t have a strong preference for Git vs Hg but the GitHub tools are stellar. > On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > I agree that github and respec is the way to go moving forward. > > >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Regrets I cannot make the meeting today. >> >> My preference is to use Github and Respec as that is what I use for other docs I edit (html5 etc). Its a workflow I am familiar with. >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1 >> >> >>> On 25 March 2014 20:33, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> Michael, >>> >>> Thank for your detailed collection of options/pro-cons for the UAIG suite of documents. >>> >>> I am not a member of the PF editors list so Janina pointed me to this. We should move pf-editing to a public space list. For now, I am posting this to public-pwfg space. >>> >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-pf-editors/2014JanMar/0006.html >>> >>> I know PF's name is also changing so we will be getting a whole new set of lists. >>> >>> Rich >>> >>> >>> Rich Schwerdtfeger >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 16:05:22 UTC