W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-pfwg@w3.org > March 2014

Re: PF editors

From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:04:53 -0700
Message-id: <055D6688-7D7E-4C43-803A-5E8D6F948385@apple.com>
Cc: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Mark Sadecki <mark@w3.org>, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
+1 to ReSpec and GitHub.

I don’t have a strong preference for Git vs Hg but the GitHub tools are stellar.


> On Mar 26, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree that github and respec is the way to go moving forward.
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Regrets I cannot make the meeting today.
>> 
>> My preference is to use Github and Respec as that is what I use for other docs I edit (html5 etc). Its a workflow I am familiar with.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> SteveF
>> HTML 5.1
>> 
>> 
>>> On 25 March 2014 20:33, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Michael, 
>>> 
>>> Thank for your detailed collection of options/pro-cons for the UAIG suite of documents. 
>>> 
>>> I am not a member of the PF editors list so Janina pointed me to this. We should move pf-editing to a public space list. For now, I am posting this to public-pwfg space.  
>>> 
>>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-pf-editors/2014JanMar/0006.html
>>> 
>>> I know PF's name is also changing so we will be getting a whole new set of lists.
>>> 
>>> Rich
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>>> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2014 16:05:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:45:01 UTC