Hi, Julie. That was just an algorithm, it's not necessary perfect, and
probably wasn't even designed keeping in mind edge cases. I think we should
do what's reasonable. What do you think we should do for case 6?
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Julie Jeongeun Kim <je00julie.kim@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Thanks for your detail description.
> Your description covers generally all cases.
> But I'm not clear about the case 4 and the case 6.
> The case 4 and the case 6 are similar.
>
> Case 4)
> The first th is column header role because it is preceded by header cell
> as you described.
>
> Case 6)
> The first th is row header role even though it is preceded by header cell.
>
> Did I miss something?
>
> Thanks,
> Julie
>
>
> 2014-12-19 1:05 GMT+09:00 Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>:
>>
>> sure :)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2014-12-18 9:15 AM, Alexander Surkov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's correction.
>>>> * if header is preceded by header cells then it's a column header, if
>>>> it is preceded by cells then it's a raw header
>>>> * if header is followed by header cells then it's a column header, if
>>>> it is followed by cells then it's a raw header
>>>>
>>>
>>> You mean "row" header, not "raw" header, right?
>>>
>>> --
>>> ;;;;joseph.
>>>
>>> 'Array(16).join("wat" - 1) + " Batman!"'
>>> - G. Bernhardt -
>>>
>>>