- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:17:39 +0100
- To: Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com>
- Cc: "W3C WAI Protocols & Formats" <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 09:18:47 UTC
hi leonie, have a look at thread(s) on public PF list on aria-roledescription http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014Apr/ -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 2 April 2014 09:15, Léonie Watson <lwatson@paciellogroup.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > > Web components offer exciting possibilities, and accessibility is going to > need to keep pace with this potential. This came up at EdgeConf recently, > where ARIA was widely thought to be the solution amongst developers. > > > > I'm not sure that ARIA (as it stands) can keep pace with the near infinite > range of components that developers could/will create? It seems improbable > that the ARIA spec could ever encompass every/any element/role that a > developer might conjure up. > > > > Jeremy Keith made this point at EdgeConf, and also suggested the > possibility of ARIA becoming extensible [1]. > > > > I thought it was worth raising here for discussion. Apologies if it's > already being discussed here or elsewhere. > > > > Léonie. > > [1] http://adactio.com/journal/6719/ > > > > > > > > -- > > Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG > > @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup > > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 09:18:47 UTC