On 01/11/2013 9:20 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer wrote: > It un-magically changed from a "must" to a "should" last May, based on > the face-to-face meeting earilier in March. Given all the work on it > the past few days -- clarifying the text, and creating legitimate > tests -- perhaps it should be changed back to a must. But, I'm not > sure that's allowed in this time frame, or whether someone would > object to that change. > I suggest, if you've done the work of clarifying the spec and think it won't draw objections and can be implemented by the end of today, then go ahead and commit the change. But don't convert the "should" to "must" with this edit. It is a bit late for that, and don't want to make a hasty decision on a normative change. The "mustness" can be revisited in the 1.1 version (might be good to record an issue in the tracker). Michael -- Michael Cooper Web Accessibility Specialist World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org> Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>
Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 13:59:33 UTC