- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:20:40 -0400
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
> Only one reason I can see: spec should be clear and unambiguous
Yes, it should be (it must be?).
> I afraid that should may magically turn into must one day
It un-magically changed from a "must" to a "should" last May, based on
the face-to-face meeting earilier in March. Given all the work on it
the past few days -- clarifying the text, and creating legitimate tests
-- perhaps it should be changed back to a must. But, I'm not sure that's
allowed in this time frame, or whether someone would object to that change.
--
;;;;joseph.
'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
- J. D. Klaun -
Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 13:21:14 UTC