- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:29:28 -0400
- To: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- CC: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
Michael wrote:
> I suggest, if you've done the work of clarifying the spec and think it
> won't draw objections and can be implemented by the end of today,
> then go ahead and commit the change.
Done.
> But don't convert the "should" to "must" with this edit. It is a bit
> late for that, and don't want to make a hasty decision on a normative
> change.
I left it as a SHOULD. I don''t think we should change that without
consultation.
> The "mustness" can be revisited in the 1.1 version (might be good to
> record an issue in the tracker).
Sure. Also, Cynthia wanted to revisit the section in the 1.1 timeframe
to address how to handle author errors.
--
;;;;joseph.
'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
- J. D. Klaun -
Received on Friday, 1 November 2013 17:29:55 UTC