- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:58:38 +0200
- To: public-pfwg-comments@w3.org
I've been thinking about ARIA grids and treegrids more from the point of checking them for conformance and, therefore, from the point of view of the hoops authors need to jump through. Writing conformance checker rules that require role=row on <tr> and role=gridcell on <td> feel very author-hostile. On top of that, there's the issue that <tr> is never really a child of <table> when parsed from text/html. According to the Best Practices draft, using a <table> "in some instances that may not work for the developer". What instances are those? Considering that released IE versions don't support creating CSS tables from <div>s, how common is it really for authors to make a treegrid/grid widget out of <div>s? Does the <div> case *really* need to be supported--particularly at the cost of making the <table> case needlessly inconvenient? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 12:59:30 UTC