- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 17:59:21 -0400
- To: Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com>
- Cc: "public-personalization-tf@w3.org" <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmg2sUTSkwWUNEiDZEmNe9CqeoR95Y6dGoqBQgS1=C+q_9y1w@mail.gmail.com>
Matthew wrote: > Jennie was concerned that there may be some issues here with respect to corporate networks—we wouldn't want access to a proxy service to be a barrier to employment. Acknowledging the concern, but I will assert that is a corporate policy concern, and outside of the scope of WCAG or the W3C - it is a business rule, and not a 'standard', and/but business rules are also governed by local legislation (a.k.a. Duty To Accommodate). I liken it to similar corporate business rules such as individual users cannot install software on their machine - yet "admins" can - they can invoke an 'override' of sorts and install software for the employee. I don't see why a large corporation wouldn't have a similar policy to address proxy servers, especially if they are critical for an employee to accomplish their task - I am fairly certain that those types of use-cases have legal protections in place (where the employer has an obligation to accommodate the employee - and they have to figure out how to do so). Again, like viewport sizes, I don't see this as something we can control or influence. JF On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:23 PM Matthew Atkinson <matkinson@tpgi.com> wrote: > Hello Personalization, > > I was invited to join COGA's call earlier today and introduced them to the > purpose, action, destination and symbol attributes in a bit more detail > than on the TPAC calls. Lisa helped address the group's questions on the > work we are doing. We got quite a bit of helpful feedback, including some > very exciting links to similar work on which we might build. As with our > TPAC breakout and COGA sessions, there is a lot of excitement and > encouragement around the work we're doing. > > Minutes: https://www.w3.org/2021/11/04-coga-minutes.html > > Very high-level key discussion topics... > > 1. Several issues and nuances around making effective mappings between > symbol sets and Bliss concepts were raised by E.A. Draffan. When we have > some examples to show (which we will soon), E.A. would be happy to help us > review them, I suggested maybe inviting E.A. to join one of our calls. > > 2. E.A. Also mentioned some existing research projects, including some > related projects. I think that https://www.easyreading.eu/ is one. This > has brought back fond memories for me, as I have attended events run by, > and collaborated with, the team at JKU, lead by Klaus Miesenberger, some > time back. > > 3. Questions were raised (IIRC by David Fazio) about the possibly > overwhelming nature of using a mobile/tablet device with > smaller-than-desktop screen and displaying many symbols on it. We > acknowledged this, and discussed that UAs/extensions will probably be coded > for very specific users and situations, so we'd hope that these concerns > would be addressed. However, some discussion ensued and the importance of > it being easy to set up help across devices was mentioned. > > 4. I passed on JF's ideas about a proxy service as one option, to show how > the solution that the specification provides could be provided in a number > of ways. Jennie was concerned that there may be some issues here with > respect to corporate networks—we wouldn't want access to a proxy service to > be a barrier to employment. Again we ACK'd this. (We were out of time by > this time, but I would've added that we have a range of possibilities from > proxies to local software/extensions.) > > 5. I think it was Jennie who raised that Microsoft has been doing some > work on symbols in Edge, to aid understanding. Though I gather this doesn't > allow mapping between sets. This could form the bases of another tech demo > for us. Very exciting. Lisa is following up for more details. > > That's about all I have for now. We'll want to return to COGA with > examples, when we have them, so that we can discuss any issues concretely > with them, and iterate on things. Also we'll need to join future meetings, > and invite them to ours too. They're excited by this work, as are we, and > are keen to help us with it. > > I already passed this on to COGA and the chairs, but it was a productive > meeting, and our work and I got a warm welcome. Looking forward to > continuing to work with them! > > best regards, > > > Matthew > -- > Matthew Tylee Atkinson > -- > Senior Accessibility Engineer > TPG Interactive > https://www.tpgi.com > A Vispero Company > https://www.vispero.com > -- > This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally privileged. > It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended > recipient, please delete this message from your system and notify us > immediately. > Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken or omitted to be > taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this message is prohibited > and may be unlawful. > > -- *John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility | W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor | "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2021 21:59:51 UTC