James writes: > Do we agree that ARIA is not the correct venue for this? Hi James, I'm not sure. Having ARIA @role values like this *may* be the correct way forward (justification: this is about fine-tuning how much information is announced by screen reader, as it is primarily focused on the accessible name/"alt text") - the impact on, for example, sighted users with cognitive issues is likely very close to nil (the personalization effort primarily driven by the needs of cognitively impaired users). Before closing this (unless the ARIA WG is vehemently opposed to looking at this), I'd like to run this up the flag-pole with both APA and the Personalization TF for their thoughts (both are copied on this response). My bottom line is that *I* think this is worthy of more discussion, but perhaps it's a tad early to settle on how to resolve the issue; I do not see this as either critical or urgent, but certainly important and useful. Can you wait a week for a response? JF On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:34 PM James Nurthen <notifications@github.com> wrote: > @sinabahram <https://github.com/sinabahram> @johnfoliot > <https://github.com/johnfoliot> Do we agree that ARIA is not the correct > venue for this? I'd like to transfer this issue to a better location for > this discussion - to me that is the personalization task force. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1427#issuecomment-802414773>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJL44YUYACBO5RP6H3R6A3TEKLYBANCNFSM4ZKNIT2A> > . > -- *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Specialist "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Friday, 19 March 2021 12:04:01 UTC