W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-personalization-tf@w3.org > March 2021

2 new values for @distraction?

From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:18:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKdCpxweSsfbKs__W5=PLYKNsu-UCa=jccxs7vGCcyKPz7YNpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
Hi all,

I just responded to a thread over on ARIA Github Issues, found here:
https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1427#issuecomment-801253625

In it, I am supporting the suggestion for the need of a 'qualifier' for
different types of images that are often tagged as 'null'. I suggest that
introducing 2 new role values in ARIA might be a way forward, however it
also occurs to me that we might consider adding those "role values" as
distraction values in our personalization spec:

@distraction="*connotativeImage"* and  @distraction="*denotative image*"

Thoughts? (We're *STILL* in an editing phase with our spec, right?)

JF

-- 
*John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Specialist

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2021 17:19:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 17 March 2021 17:19:41 UTC