W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-personalization-tf@w3.org > March 2021

Re: [w3c/aria] Distinguish connotative / emotion rich decorative images from "purely" decorative ones (#1427)

From: Lisa Seeman <lisa1seeman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:16:16 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKExBMJxSkhQhycb4Te735z_U5zrvFX5EccRK7-QV8Pj2eS4nw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
Cc: "w3c/aria" <reply+AAJL4434C7IWHTHZOV3JU7N6L7JIBEVBNHHDDMHOXY@reply.github.com>, W3C WAI Accessible Platform Architectures <public-apa@w3.org>, public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>, "w3c/aria" <aria@noreply.github.com>, Mention <mention@noreply.github.com>
I once drafted an ontology for aspects in images. We could try and do
more in making svg and canvas more reusable and understandable. But i think
this is a big - and useful - project.
It could be a module for personalization or a joint TF.


Lisa

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:04 PM John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> wrote:

> James writes:
>
> > Do we agree that ARIA is not the correct venue for this?
>
> Hi James,
>
> I'm not sure. Having ARIA @role values like this *may* be the correct way
> forward (justification: this is about fine-tuning how much information is
> announced by screen reader, as it is primarily focused on the accessible
> name/"alt text") - the impact on, for example, sighted users with cognitive
> issues is likely very close to nil (the personalization effort primarily
> driven by the needs of cognitively impaired users).
>
> Before closing this (unless the ARIA WG is vehemently opposed to looking
> at this), I'd like to run this up the flag-pole with both APA and the
> Personalization TF for their thoughts (both are copied on this response).
>
> My bottom line is that *I* think this is worthy of more discussion, but
> perhaps it's a tad early to settle on how to resolve the issue; I do not
> see this as either critical or urgent, but certainly important and useful.
>
> Can you wait a week for a response?
>
> JF
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 8:34 PM James Nurthen <notifications@github.com>
> wrote:
>
>> @sinabahram <https://github.com/sinabahram> @johnfoliot
>> <https://github.com/johnfoliot> Do we agree that ARIA is not the correct
>> venue for this? I'd like to transfer this issue to a better location for
>> this discussion - to me that is the personalization task force.
>>
>> —
>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/1427#issuecomment-802414773>, or
>> unsubscribe
>> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJL44YUYACBO5RP6H3R6A3TEKLYBANCNFSM4ZKNIT2A>
>> .
>>
>
>
> --
> *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Specialist
>
> "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
> Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 22 March 2021 11:17:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 22 March 2021 11:17:09 UTC