symbols - was Re: Data-* Attributes (Take 2)

I am wondering if we can use  purpose also for symbols? they are very similar and we are trying to merge were we can.


All the best



Lisa Seeman



http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/, https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa








---- On Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:53:14 +0300 James Cambron <james.cambron@outlook.com> wrote ----



Most of what John has included is along the lines with my thinking as well. It isn't clear which use cases I added to the original prototype document but they were:



<button data-action="undo">Revert</button>

<a href="home.html" data-destination="homepage">our main page</a>




Best,

Thad






From: John Foliot <mailto:john.foliot@deque.com>
 Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 2:13 PM
 To: public-personalization-tf
 Subject: Data-* Attributes (Take 2) 
 


Hi all,



After today's conference call I have some very serious concerns on how this is moving forward. Rather than augmenting the current examples, I have instead provided an alternative proposal on how to move forward,
 building upon existing consensus (as I understand it).



Please see: https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fpersonalization-semantics%2Fwiki%2FPrototypes-with-data-dash-*-(Take-2)&data=02%7C01%7C%7C157f284c154249f9080508d6b6e6fae8%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897500497105237&sdata=sKo6jGzNbczIuahE1NJC2%2BkmdWtg%2F3qio6s%2BMpcXsjI%3D&reserved=0



JF

--

 

John Foliot | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative

 Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
 https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdeque.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C157f284c154249f9080508d6b6e6fae8%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897500497115245&sdata=1OHNaeCS63OaOpVyIinh8yiMLH0ddNa98tWrXKCQW8U%3D&reserved=0