- From: John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:05:14 -0500
- To: "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
- Cc: James Cambron <james.cambron@outlook.com>, public-personalization-tf <public-personalization-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKdCpxwwJC1bGXKy8FkOEsn3NPcuCRT4w3uFPbTxXRVxOjKsWw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Lisa, On my proposal page <https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Prototypes-with-data-dash-*-(Take-2)#attribute-to-provide-symbols-goal-images-to-replace-on-screen-text>, I am suggesting that, yes, in fact we can likely get symbols simply via the *various token values* we've declared for data-action, data-purpose, and data-destination: symbol sets will need to map-to (or otherwise align with) the tokens we've documented. As an alternative, I suggest that data-symbol attribute only serve as a **hint* *to a symbol, in those cases when a specific symbol is not already present on the end-users computer (i.e. it is/would-be a fall-back symbol). Make sense? JF On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:00 AM lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote: > I am wondering if we can use purpose also for symbols? they are very > similar and we are trying to merge were we can. > > All the best > > Lisa Seeman > > LinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter > <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa> > > > > ---- On Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:53:14 +0300 *James Cambron > <james.cambron@outlook.com <james.cambron@outlook.com>>* wrote ---- > > Most of what John has included is along the lines with my thinking as > well. It isn't clear which use cases I added to the original prototype > document but they were: > > > - <button data-action="undo">Revert</button> > - <a href="home.html" data-destination="homepage">our main page</a> > > > Best, > Thad > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 1, 2019 2:13 PM > *To:* public-personalization-tf > *Subject:* Data-* Attributes (Take 2) > > Hi all, > > After today's conference call I have some very serious concerns on how > this is moving forward. Rather than augmenting the current examples, I have > instead provided an alternative proposal on how to move forward, building > upon existing consensus (as I understand it). > > Please see: > https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Prototypes-with-data-dash-*-(Take-2) > <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fpersonalization-semantics%2Fwiki%2FPrototypes-with-data-dash-*-(Take-2)&data=02%7C01%7C%7C157f284c154249f9080508d6b6e6fae8%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897500497105237&sdata=sKo6jGzNbczIuahE1NJC2%2BkmdWtg%2F3qio6s%2BMpcXsjI%3D&reserved=0> > > JF > -- > > *John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative > Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good > deque.com > <https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdeque.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C157f284c154249f9080508d6b6e6fae8%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897500497115245&sdata=1OHNaeCS63OaOpVyIinh8yiMLH0ddNa98tWrXKCQW8U%3D&reserved=0> > > > > -- *​John Foliot* | Principal Accessibility Strategist | W3C AC Representative Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good deque.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 April 2019 14:06:16 UTC