Re: Problems and Opportunities at purl.org

Yeah, let's get this going.

So looking at the purl database schema we don't really need the group
and user stuff to start with (although that could be added to the
README).

the purls table itself should be sufficient to start. We can find the
different "type" values in the purl.org source code I think?



On 29 February 2016 at 11:58, Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Greetings, all.
>
> A little while ago (and this message is a reply to
> <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-perma-id/2015Dec/0001.html>, to
> resuscitate the thread), there was some interest expressed in a purl.org
> successor.  That thread ended on a positive note, with David Wood and some
> others having access to the schema, and OCLC apparently keen on passing
> forward the current repository.
>
> I was asked about purl.org by a colleague today, and this reminded me about
> last November/December's thread: is there any news about purl.org or the
> broader preservation plan, that can be passed on?  Or is there any way that
> I or others could help with this?
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Norman
>
>
> --
> Norman Gray  :  https://nxg.me.uk
> SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, UK
>



-- 
Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/    http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718

Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 12:30:05 UTC