W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > November 2016

[Agenda] 30 November Payments Apps Task Force Call

From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:09:54 -0600
Message-Id: <A49B3D55-57BC-4C95-91AA-2551B8F2AF74@w3.org>
To: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Participants in the payments app task force,

We meet 30 November at 9am ET. Draft agenda below.

Previous meeting 23 November:

WebEx (as usual):

Possible regrets: AdrianHB.


Upcoming meeting schedule:
* 7 Dec, 14 Dec, 4 Jan 2017

ACTION Ian 20161116: Look into a new meeting time based on who is participating in the call.

Let's discuss a new weekly meeting time:
 * Tuesdays, 10am ET or 11am ET (for 1 hour)
 * Participation from Asia has described, while participation on the
   West Coast and Europe has increased.

Recent spec edits

 * Tommy edits regarding cancelation and failure handling:

   Propose to close Tommy's action from 20161123: Write a proposal for
   section 10.4 around issue 37 to consider (1) graceful failure in
   the case of cancelation and (2) mention of retry.

 * WebIDL fix

Pull request review:

(AHB and Ian have not yet had time to close this one; we may have to wait a week.)

* Removed notions of open/proprietary; AdrianHB requested changes

ACTION Ian 20161123: Add a pointer from the spec to the issue of UA
retrying other matching payment apps after cancelation or failure.

See https://github.com/w3c/webpayments-payment-apps-api/pull/70/commits/7553f82cd9c45fe38e04f08efc2aaf9c79ad4f1f

Issue 69: What does Icon mean?

ACTION Ian 20161123: Update the payment app spec to copy web app manifest term for icon_s.

Status: Proposal:

Issue 48: Payment app identifier to payment app manifest filename mapping

Proposal from Adrian:


ACTION 20161102: AdamR to take a stab at writing up description of payment app function to return boolean if filter matches; see

Payment app pilots

* Update on Opera/Samsung work on Chromium version that can
  support service-worker based payment apps.

Issue 12: Passing details on payment options

Let's return to the question of whether payment option
details should be passed to the mediator for display.
Any updates based on implementation experience?

Other issues

* Review of open issues

Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447

Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2016 16:10:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:20 UTC