W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > July 2016

Re: Comments on HTTP API before publishing FPWD

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:12:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+eFz_+x+Kw_CgtAvyVVK1AH_6FSMZ3eerjY78AJB3i+d2zsOw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Great thanks!

I'll review again and have my comments in by Tuesday too.

If there's a general feeling that we have the scope well covered (i.e.
addressed in the spec or called out via an issue marker) then I think we
should issue a CfC.

If there are significant concerns we can address them on Thursday's call.

On 15 July 2016 at 04:58, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

> On 07/14/2016 11:29 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie wrote:
> >> *Terminology* If we are going to pull the terminology in we need
> >> to fix it up asap. If it's going to be used in public working
> >> drafts it needs a clean up.
> >
> > I'm fine w/ making a pass on this, but don't think it's necessary
> > before FPWD.
> >
> > Really? I'm not crazy about that but I'd like to hear what the group
> >  thinks.
> >
> > Perhaps we can use a static snapshot that we edit inline and then
> > push back to the shared glossary when it stabilizes?
>
> For the time being, I have added an issue marker to note that the
> terminology needs to be updated:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-http-api/#issue-3
>
> >> *Push Payments* We need to demonstrate both a push and a pull
> >> based payment. This is still very pull based.
> >
> > Agree that we should do some work in the push-based payments case,
> > but seeing as how none of our other specs talk about push-based
> > payments, I don't think it's necessary to get this in there (other
> > than possibly an issue marker) before FPWD.
> >
> >
> > PaymentRequest is very agnostic in this regard. It feels like HTTP is
> > very pull-focused in comparison.
>
> I have added issue markers to note that this is an area of active
> discussion:
>
> https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-http-api/#issue-4
> https://w3c.github.io/webpayments-http-api/#issue-12
>
> > I will not object to publishing if the issues in the text are also
> > in the issue list and any issues in the list are also in the text as
> >  markers (if appropriate).
>
> I have added all issues that were only in the specs to the issue tracker
> for Core Messages and HTTP API. Let me know if I didn't add specific
> ones that you wanted to add.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> JSON-LD Best Practice: Context Caching
> https://manu.sporny.org/2016/json-ld-context-caching/
>
>
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 08:13:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 15 July 2016 08:13:18 UTC