W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > January 2016

Re: [webpayments] PROPOSAL: Adopt developer friendly-terminology for WG deliverables but root this in ISO20022 data dictionary through our published glossary. (#67)

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 13:04:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+eFz_LMBNS2k9CrOExG+edApTEgX7oW7j0hRoCzy6XF10QWOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Rather than postponing this proposal again due to shortcomings in the
clarity of the language please suggest any changes before our 28 January
call and I will amend the proposal as required.

On 23 January 2016 at 12:59, Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>

> PROPOSAL (from @mattsaxon <https://github.com/mattsaxon> )
> In keeping with the WG resolution to try and root our terminology in the
> ISO20022 data dictionary the WG will adopt the following terms for use in
> its deliverables:
> W3C Web Payments Term Common Terms ISO 20022 definition
> Payee Merchant Creditor, Beneficiary
> Payee PSP Acquirer, Gateway Acquirer, Intermediary
> Payer Shopper, Consumer, User Debtor, Initiator
> Payee PSP Wallet Intermediary
>    - We will use the W3C Payments Terms in the W3C specifications (to
>    avoid writing out in detail).
>    - In the flows we would use the complete terms, however it should be
>    realised that Common terms and ISO 20022 definitions may change between
>    flows, for example for Direct Debit the ISO20022 term is Beneficiary,
>    whilst for Credit Transfer it is Creditor.
>    - We will endeavour to have the W3C Terms added to the ISO repository
>    as reserved words or ideally as specific mappings, e.g. a Payee is the
>    superclass of both the subclasses of Creditors and Beneficiary.
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/67>.
Received on Saturday, 23 January 2016 11:04:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:13 UTC