- From: Dave Longley <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 13:14:41 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 22 January 2016 21:15:36 UTC
@bifurcation, > Nonetheless, these proposals are still dealing with authentication, so they're still very distinct from what the CG has been talking about. I agree that the CG is doing something different from the Web Authentication group. The CG work is about verifiable claims/attributes. This is a layer above the FIDO/Web Authentication work because it has to do with what is out of scope for that group (e.g. multi-origin credentials/federated identity/etc.), but that doesn't mean it has no relation to authentication, e.g. did entity A really make claim B about entity C? The two groups are doing different things at different layers, but both see the Credential Management API as a potential fit (and the CG has built a demo that shows that fit). --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/63#issuecomment-174051139
Received on Friday, 22 January 2016 21:15:36 UTC