Re: [webpayments] What are the WPWG February 2016 face-to-face prioritized issues (#89)

> What do you think of using the issue tracker to capture these in the same way we have been doing 
> for calls? There is already a "Resolve at F2F" milestone?

+1, although I don't have the time to triage, unfortunately. I was just trying to set this issue up as a big dumping ground for prioritized issues that are important for folks - it's up to the chairs/staff to organize them into something they think would be the most efficient wrt. making progress.

> On that note, are there any of our existing proposals/questions that we should tag for the F2F?

I did a scan through them and there is some overlap here and there. I'll try to do another scan before the F2F, but honestly almost every hour of my awake time is allocated from now until the face-to-face.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/89#issuecomment-185781857