Re: [webpayments] What are the WPWG February 2016 face-to-face prioritized issues (#89) from Adrian Hope-Bailie on 2016-02-15 (public-payments-wg@w3.org from February 2016)

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 02:43:20 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/89/184162248@github.com>

I mean to link to the wiki page: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/wiki/Issue-Summary
I changed it from a comparison of the proposals to a high level issue summary.
I was capturing the various proposals and for and against shipping address capture which provides an idea of the format I was experimenting with.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/89#issuecomment-184162248

Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 10:44:17 UTC