W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [webpayments] What are the WPWG February 2016 face-to-face prioritized issues (#89)

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:47:24 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/89/184115848@github.com>
Thanks @msporny.

@mattsaxon started documenting "Differences between the proposals" a while back on the wiki, which wasn't a bad basis for coming up with some good discussion material for the face-to-face.

What do you think of using the issue tracker to capture these in the same way we have been doing for calls? There is already a "Resolve at F2F" milestone?

We can use this thread to brainstorm but when there is a concrete proposal let's capture it as such and allow the group to discuss it.

On that note, are there any of our existing proposals/questions that we should tag for the F2F?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 08:47:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC