Re: [webpayments] What are the WPWG February 2016 face-to-face prioritized issues (#89)

Thanks @msporny.

@mattsaxon started documenting "Differences between the proposals" a while back on the wiki, which wasn't a bad basis for coming up with some good discussion material for the face-to-face.

What do you think of using the issue tracker to capture these in the same way we have been doing for calls? There is already a "Resolve at F2F" milestone?

We can use this thread to brainstorm but when there is a concrete proposal let's capture it as such and allow the group to discuss it.

On that note, are there any of our existing proposals/questions that we should tag for the F2F?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/89#issuecomment-184115848