Re: wpwg-ACTION-1: Write up the group operations in a wiki (re email, issues, etc.)

Until we feel there is a need for another wiki I suggest we go with the
group's decision to use the GitHub wiki.

Nick will be sending out a mail in the next few days listing all of the
resources we'll be using and where to find them.


On 2 November 2015 at 10:37, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote:

> On Friday, October 30, 2015 5:38 AM, mel pullen wrote:
> > Can I suggest that you need two wikis.
> >
> > One is the wiki for the group operations to do with the standards
> making.
> >
> > The other is the wiki for technical considerations for the open source
> code.
> > Github has a [wiki functionality](
> https://help.github.com/articles/about-github-wikis/)
> > that can be integrated with issues arising from the code.
>
> This is a standards working group so I'm not sure what "the open source
> code" is.
> Do you mean the test suite? I think we only need one wiki.
>
> That said, I have made a start on my actions from the meeting and I don't
> recall a clear
> consensus on which wiki to use. The WG home page points to the W3C
> instance but there
> was mention of the GitHub wiki during the meeting.
>
> Since neither currently contains any pages I didn't want to pick a winner.
> Please can
> the chairs and team contacts make a decision about the wiki location and
> let me know?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ade.
>