Re: Linking the Wiki to the example Flows

> On Dec 3, 2015, at 9:57 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> 
> On 12/03/2015 06:09 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>>> I think we should be using SVG output in the specs (so the specs
>>> are self-contained when it comes to W3C publishing, and meet our
>>> accessibility needs).
>> 
>> That to me is a separate question.
> 
> It is, but it's one that is important to the editors of the specs. It
> would be nice for us to use the same solution for the Flows Task Force
> and the specs.
> 

Nice but not critical. Right now we have an easy solution to facilitate
flow discussions. I do not think we want the same solution for the specs
in the longer term (+1 to SVG images).

Ian


> My point was that I think it's possible using Shane's proxy, I don't
> think it's possible using the PlantUML proxy (unless it can output SVG
> as well).
> 
>> Right now we are determining flows we want to address; that can be
>> done outside the specs.
> 
> Yes, but we already have a need to integrate graphical flows into the
> Credentials CG Browser API spec.
> 
> I'm saying: It looks like there is a single solution that would work for
> multiple "diagram" problems that we have at the moment.
> 
> -- manu
> 
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
> https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447